something about he did not want the government avnihg a chokehold on his rights to own. Of course, he is absolutely right, because he has a Constitutionally assured freedom to own. (However, I believe that there is a hugely obscene interpretation of the Second Amendment, suggesting that it is nearly a religious talisman to own a gun). His final comment, though, was morally uplifting. He stated that he keeps his Bible and his gun close together so that he can embrace either or both anytime he wants. Which of these two embraceables do you suppose you would encounter if you had a strong disagreement with this individual? I guess what I thought he must be saying is that he would either prosyletize you to death or shoot you to death, depending on which embraceable his hand lit on at the moment of decision.Jason, I'm quoting here some of the stuff you wrote that I feel is pretty close to the absolute If someone is convicted of a violent crime, they have given up some of their rights, and gun ownership is one of them. You do not get to deny someone their rights, because you THINK THEY MIGHT be dangerous, in a way that would be like telling you that you cannot own a house because you might not take care of it and lower the value of your neighbors home, because you are lazy at work.this is a ridiculous argument to deny ownership of property, just as you have a ridiculous argument to keep guns away from people who have not committed any crime That is right Jason, it is not up to the individual's thought patterns whether the person is capable of suitably owning a gun. It is up to law-enforcement, city, local, state and federal. It is them who check the person's BACKGROUND and issue an OK or no. If the person has a license to carry, issued by an LE agency, (sheriff, police department or some federal agency), then they can bypass the mandatory waiting period (some like to call it a cooling off period) and immediately assume ownership of the weapon. If there is no license to carry, then the person has to wait several days while the BACKGROUND CHECK is completed. If the LE function says the person can own a gun, then they can go to the dealer and assume ownership if LE says no -there is a reason. There are four positions which I would like you to consider when deciding if you want this individual (by the way you cannot decide, but you can have an opinion), living next door, or even on your block.1. Person cannot pass a background check.2. Person passed a background check, and assumes ownership of a gun after a waiting period.3. Person purchases a gun and takes it home he has a gun permit (also called a license to carry).4. Person purchased a gun at a gunshow.

this is easily the best pizza restaurant in the valley, the owners tony and karen are the nicest people you will ever meet along with some of their employees. Their prices are reasonable and their food taste and quality surpasses those of the larger pizza chains.
philip

Excellent prices and pizza!

We first went to Tony's because the large pepperoni was only $5. Turns out it is actually very good too, so I now stop on the way home from work at least a couple of times per month. They are always hot and ready. Love it!!!

this is the best place to eat thats affordadble in yakima

Good pizza!